Chapter IV
General procedure of consideration of and adjudication upon the cases before the Constitutional Court

Article 27

1. A case shall be considered at an open sitting of the Constitutional Court.
2. On the initiative of the Constitutional Court or upon the petition of the parties a sitting of the Constitutional Court or a part thereof may be closed to the public for the protection of personal, professional, commercial or state secret. The witnesses, experts and interpreters may be present at a closed sitting, if need be. Upon the petition of the parties, the Constitutional Court may entitle other persons to attend the closed sitting as well.
3. The Constitutional Court shall adopt a ruling on the consideration of the case at a closed sitting in the judges’ deliberation room.
4. An individual under the age of sixteen shall not be admitted to a court sitting, unless he/she is a witness; nor shall an armed person other than those ensuring the security of the Constitutional Court, and the latter shall be admitted only by the permission of the President of the Constitutional Court.
5. The judgment of the Constitutional Court shall be delivered publicly.

Article 27¹  (29.12.2006 N 4215)

 1. The issue of  admission a case for consideration on the merits shall  be considered without oral hearing. The Constitutional Court shall be authorized to consider a case with oral hearing, if elucidation of the circumstances related to the adoption of a case for consideration of the merits is impossible otherwise.

2. The Constitutional Court shall be authorized to consider the merits of a case without oral hearing on the basis of a written demand of a claimant or/and a respodent.

3.The claimants’s demand on consideration of a case without oral hearing shall be submitted together with a constitutional claim/ submission or within 10 days from receiving by claimant of a recording notice about admission of a constitutional claim/submission for consideration.  Constitutional Court shall send the claimant’s demand to respodent  upon receiving thereof.

4.Respodent’s demand on consideration of a case without oral hearing shall be submitted within 10 days from receiving by respondent either a constitutional claim/submission or a recording notice about admission of a constitutional claim/submission for consideration. Constitutional Court shall send the respodent’s demand to a claimant upon receiving thereof.

5.Constitutional Court shall be authorized to consider a case without oral hearing unless a respodent requests the consideration of a case with oral hearing within 10 days from receiving of a notification from the Constitutional Court on the claimant’s demand or unless a claimant   requests the consideration of a case with oral hearing within 10 days from receiving of a notification from the Constitutional Court on the respodent’s demand.

Article 28

The legal proceedings before the Constitutional Court shall be conducted in Georgian. The Court shall be obliged to attach an interpreter to the participant to the case having no command of the language of the legal proceedings.

Article 29

The participants shall be entitled to get acquainted with the case-file, make extracts and photocopies thereof, adduce evidences, participate in the examination of evidences, put questions to witnesses, experts and specialists, petition the Constitutional Court, give the Court oral or written explanations, file submissions and give observations regarding all the issues raised during the consideration of the case, object to the petitions, conclusions and observations of the other party.

Article 30

1. At any stage of the proceedings the parties shall have the right to entrust the protection of their interests to a lawyer or other person having a higher legal education.
2. At any stage of the proceedings the parties shall have the right to entrust the discharge of their authorization to their proxy - a representative.

Article 31

1. Lodging with the Constitutional Court a constitutional claim or a constitutional submission set out in writing shall be the basis for initiating a case before the Constitutional Court.
2. A constitutional claim or a constitutional submission shall be reasoned. The evidence which in the opinion of the claimant or the author of the submission corroborates the grounds of the claim or submission shall necessarily be adduced in the constitutional claim or a constitutional submission. (12.02.02 №1264)

  Article 32   (29.12.2006 N 4215)

 1.Warning the witnesses before the Constitutional Court, application of measures against those violating the order at the court sitting and the examination of evidences shall be effected in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.

 2.The President of the sitting shall give notice to the person disrupting the order in the courtroom. If she/he repeatedly disrupts the order or shows disrespect towards court, the person may be ordered out in case, by the directive of the President of the sitting, which shall not prevent from futher considering the case.  The person will be presumed to be  expelled untill the consideration of a case is ended. Upon reasoned petition of the party the President of the sitting may entitle removal person to attend at a court sitting. In case of the removal of a party the President of the sitting  may entitle the party to be present at a sitting upon the reasoned  petition of the same party.

   Article  32¹ (29.12.2006 N 4215)

 1.The staff structure of the Constitutional court may envisage Service of the   Guard  of the Constitutional court, a main function of which shall be protection of the court building and the maintenance of the public order on its territory.

 2.Guard of the Constitutional  Court is a public servant. A capable person from 22 years, who speaks the state language and has relevant health conditions for fulfilling such job, can be appointed as a Guard of the Constitutional court. The age limit for Guard service of the Constitutional court is 50 years. The person, convicted in the past, shall not be appointed as a Guard of the Constitutional court. 

3.  Guard of the Constitutional court shall:

   a) ensure safety of members of the Constitutional court, parties to the law suit and witnesses, who are in the building and territory of the Constitutional court;

  b) ensure protection of the Constitutional court building and territory;

  c) maintain public order in the court room of the Constitutional court;

  d) abide by instructions of the President of the Constituional court and the President of the sitting with regard to the public order protection;

  e)  seize public disorder in the court building and territory, detect violators, if necessary detains them to later transfer to Police, design a report on the fact; the format of the report shall be confirmed by the Plenum of the Constitutional court;

4.  Guard of the court shall be authorized to use of physical force, special devices and firearms only in cases when it is impossible to fulfill official functions with application of some other means;

5. Guard of the court shall be authorized to use physical force and special devices considering conditions described under the fourth paragraph of the present  article in following cases:

   a) seizure of the legal violation and detaining the violator;

   b) Prevention of attacks on members of the Constitutional court, parties to the law suit, witnesses and persons attending the court hearing;

   c) physical opposition to the Guard of the Constitutional court while exercising his authority;

  d)  To transfer detainee to Police in case of the sufficient grounds to believe that the violator will go into hiding or cause damages to those around;

6.  . Before use of physical force, special devices and firearms the Guard of the Constitutional court shall:

   a) warn persons about use of physical force, special devices or firearms, give them enough time to fulfill his requirements, except for when the delay may lead to risk to Guard ’s of the court  or other persons’ life or health or some other heavy results or when it is impossible to give warning;

  b) use physical force, special devices or firearms in accordance with the risk level, trying to cause as little damage as possible;

  c)  in any case when using physical force, special devices or firearms must inform  the President of the Constitutional court in writing after 24 hours of their usage;

  d)  try not to create a risk to health and lives of those around when using physical force, special devices or firearms;

7. It is prohibited to use physical force, special devices or firearms against pregnant, disabled or juveniles. Use of special devices or physical force shall be authorized only in cases when actions of the pregnant, disabled or juvenile cause an obvious risk to health and lives of the Guard of the Constitutional court and others.

 8. In execution of functions, Guard of the Constitutional court shall wear an uniform and a badge. The uniform and the badge shall be confirmed by the Plenum of the Constitutional court.

Article 33

1. The President of Georgia, the Government of Georgia and not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim with the Constitutional Court concerning conformity with the Constitution of Georgia of the constitutional agreement, the laws of Georgia, the normative resolutions of the Parliament of Georgia, normative acts of the President of Georgia, the Government of Georgia, higher state bodies of Abkhazia and the Autonomous Republic of Ajara and the normative acts adopted/enacted by the relevant bodies before the enforcement of the Constitution of Georgia, as well as on conformity with the Constitution of adoption/enactment of, signing, promulgating and enforcing legislative acts and resolutions of the Parliament of Georgia .
2. The body against whose normative act th e constitutional claim is lodged shall be the respondent to the cases, provided for by the first paragraph of the present Article; whereas the constitutional claim concerning a normative act adopted/enacted before the enforcement of the Constitution, the relevant body successor to that having adopted the act shall be the respondent and to the cases where no such body exists the Parliament of Georgia, the President of Georgia, the Government of Georgia, the higher representative or executive bodies of Abkhazia and the Autonomous Republic of Ajara respectively shall be the respondents in pursuance of the decision of the Constitutional Court.
( 25.11.04 №599)

Article 34

1. The President of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim with the Constitutional Court concerning the scope of the competencies between the state bodies, if he/she considers that his/her competence have been infringed upon or the scope of the constitutional powers of state bodies are violated; not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim with the Constitutional Court, if they believe that the scopes of the constitutional powers of the Parliament of Georgia or another state body are infringed upon; the state bodies listed in Article 89 of the Constitution of Georgia shall also have such a right, if they believe that the scopes of their constitutional powers have been infringed upon.
2. The state body the normative act thereof in the claimant’s opinion led to the infringement upon the claimant’s constitutional competencies shall be the respondent to the cases listed in the first paragraph of the present Article. (12.02.02 №1264)
3. Upon the reception of a constitutional claim or a constitutional submission on competencies the Constitutional Court shall send a copy of the constitutional claim or a submission to the President of Georgia, the Government of Georgia, the Parliament of Georgia and the higher representative bodies of Abkhazia and Ajara. If within fifteen days of delivery of the copy, any of these bodies declares that upholding the constitutional claim or submission would cause infringement upon the scope of its power the Constitutional Court shall be obliged to invite the body as a party to the case. (25.11.04 №1264 ).

Article 35

1. The President of Georgia, not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia and the higher state bodies of Abkhazia and the Autonomous Republic of Ajara shall have the right to lodge a claim with the Constitutional Court concerning constitutionality of the formation of political associations of citizens and their activity. (12.02.02 №1264)
2. The political associations of citizens and the body having registered it shall be the respondents to the cases, provided for by the first paragraph of the present Article. (12.02.02 №1264)

Article 36

1. The following shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim to the Constitutional Court concerning constitutionality of holding a referendum:
a. not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, if the President of Georgia on his/her own initiative or at the request of constituents has called or notwithstanding the request of Parliament of Georgia has not called a referendum;
b. the Public Defender of Georgia, if notwithstanding the electors' request a referendum is not called;
c. not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, the Public Defender of Georgia, if they believe that the holding a referendum contradicts the requirements of Article 74.2 of the Constitution of Georgia.
d. at least one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, the President of Georgia, the Public Defender of Georgia, if they believe that the referendum is held in violation of the requirements laid down in the third paragraph of Article 74 of the Constitution of Georgia. ( 12.02.02 №1264)
2. To the cases, provided for by subparagraphs “a-c” of the first paragraph of the present Article the President of Georgia shall be the respondent, whereas in the cases, provided for by subparagraph “d” the Central Electoral Commission of Georgia shall be the respondent. (12.02.02 №1264 )
3. In the cases, provided for by subparagraphs “a”-“c” of the same paragraph, the time-limit allowed for lodging a constitutional claim, defined in the first paragraph of the present Article, shall not exceed fifteen days from the expiry of the term established by the first paragraph of Article 74 of the Constitution of Georgia, or from the date, on which the referendum is scheduled, whereas in the cases, provided for by the subparagraph “d” of the same paragraph, the time-limit shall not exceed seven days from the promulgation of the referendum results by the Central Electoral Commission. (12.02.02 №1264 )

Article 37

1. The following shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim with the Constitutional Court on constitutionality of election:
a) at least one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia and the Public Defender of Georgia, if they believe that election of the President of Georgia is scheduled in violation of the requirements laid down in the seventh and tenth paragraphs of Article 70 and/or the third paragraph of Article 76 of the Constitution of Georgia or they are not scheduled thus violating the same requirements;
b) at least one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, if they believe that election of the President of Georgia is held in violation of the requirements laid down in Article 28 and/or 70 of the Constitution of Georgia
c) at least one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia and the Public Defender of Georgia, if they believe that general election or re-elections of the Parliament of Georgia, or occasional election of a new member of the Parliament due to the pre-term termination of a mandate of a member of the Parliament is scheduled in violation of the requirements laid down in the third and fifth paragraphs of Article 50 and/or the second paragraph of Article 73 of the Constitution of Georgia, or are not scheduled notwithstanding the requirements, as well as the President of Georgia, if he/she believes that the re-elections of the Parliament of Georgia or election of a new member of the Parliament due to the pre-term termination of a mandate of a member of the Parliament, is scheduled in violation of the requirements laid down in the fifth paragraph of Article 50 of the Constitution of Georgia, or are not scheduled notwithstanding the requirements;
d) the President of Georgia, not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, if they believe that elections of the Parliament of Georgia are held in violation of the requirements laid down in Article 28, in the first and second paragraphs of Article 49 and/or Article 50 of the Constitution of Georgia;
e) not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia and the Public Defender of Georgia, if they believe that elections of the local self-government bodies are scheduled in violation of the requirements laid down in the fourth paragraph of Article 2 and/or the second paragraph of Article 7³ of the Constitution of Georgia, or are not scheduled notwithstanding the requirements;
f) the President of Georgia, not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, if they believe that elections of the local self-government bodies are held in violation of the requirements laid down in the fourth paragraph of Article 2 and/or Article 28 of the Constitution of Georgia.
2. Insofar as the first paragraph of the present Article is concerned:
a) to the case provided for by subparagraph “a” the Parliament of Georgia (concerning scheduling pre-term elections) or the Central Electoral Commission of Georgia shall be the respondent;
b) to the cases, provided for by subparagraphs “b” and “d” the Central Electoral Commission of Georgia shall be the respondent;
c) to the case provided for by subparagraph “c” the President of Georgia (concerning scheduling general elections) or Central Electoral Commission of Georgia (scheduling re-elections or occasional elections due to the pre-term termination of a mandate of a member of the Parliament) shall be the respondent;
d) to the case provided for by subparagraph “e” the President of Georgia (concerning scheduling general election) or the Central Electoral Commission of Georgia (scheduling re-elections, or occasional election of a Gamgebeli/Mayor due to the pre-term termination of a mandate of a member of the Sakrebulo) shall be the respondent;
e) to the case provided for by subparagraph “f” the respective district electoral commission and/or the Central Electoral Commission of Georgia shall be the respondent.
3. Lodging with the Constitutional Court a constitutional claim concerning constitutionality of scheduling the election referred to in the present Article shall be permissible not later than 7 days from promulgation of a legal act on scheduling the election or expiry of the time-limit for scheduling, as provided for by the Constitution of Georgia and respective law.
4. Lodging with the Constitutional Court a constitutional claim concerning constitutionality of holding the election referred to in the present Article shall be permissible within three days from the promulgation of the election results by the Central Electoral Commission of Georgia.
(12.02.02 №1264)

Article 38

1. The President of Georgia, the Government of Georgia and not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim on constitutionality of international treaties and agreements or particular provisions thereof, whereas a constitutional submission shall be lodged by not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia. (25.11.04 №599 )
2. A constitutional submission shall be lodged regarding constitutionality of those international treaties or agreements or particular provisions thereof, which are subject to ratification. A constitutional submission may be lodged before their ratification. (12.02.02 №1264)
21. A constitutional claim shall be lodged regarding constitutionality of an international treaty or an agreement being in force or particular provisions thereof. A constitutional claim may be lodged:
a) within 30 days from the refusal of the Parliament of Georgia to denounce or annul a ratified international treaty or agreement, or particular provisions thereof;
b) not earlier than 31 and not later than 60 days from the raising before the Parliament of Georgia the issue of denunciation or termination of a ratified international treaty or agreement or particular provisions thereof, if the Parliament failed to take a decision on the issue within 30 days;
c) if an international treaty or agreement is not subject to ratification. (12.02.02 №1264)
3. Lodging a constitutional claim concerning conformity with the Constitution of an international treaty, agreement or particular provisions thereof, which is ratified before recognition of the authority of the first composition of the Constitutional Court, shall be permissible after their ratification as well.
4. In the case provided for by the third paragraph of the present Article lodging a constitutional claim shall be possible within the term of three months after recognition of the authority of the first composition of the Constitutional Court. The consideration by the Parliament of Georgia of the issue of the denunciation of a treaty provided for by the third paragraph of the present Article shall suspend the running of the aforementioned term. (12.02.02 №1264)
5. (12.02.02 №1264)
6. In the case provided for by subparagraphs “a” and “b” of paragraph 21 of the present Article, the Parliament of Georgia shall be the respondent, whereas in the case provided for by subparagraph “c” the body/official having concluded the international treaty or agreement or their respective successors shall be the respondent. (12.02.02 №1264)

Article 39

1. The following shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim on constitutionality of a normative act or a particular provisions thereof:
a) Citizens of Georgia, other individuals residing in Georgia and legal entities of Georgia, if they believe that their rights and freedoms recognized by Chapter Two of the Constitution of Georgia are infringed or may be directly infringed upon;
b) The Public Defender of Georgia, if he/she believes that human rights and freedoms, recognized by Chapter Two of the Constitution of Georgia, are infringed upon.
2. A body/official whose act in the opinion of the claimant led to the infringement upon the rights and freedoms recognized by Chapter Two of the Constitution of Georgia shall be the respondent to the cases under the present Article.
(12.02.02 №1264)

Article 40

1. The President of Georgia, not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia. as well as a citizen whose office as of a member of the Parliament is not recognized or is pre-term terminated by the Parliament of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim on constitutionality of the decision of the Parliament on recognition of the office or pre-term termination of the office of a member of the Parliament.
2. The Parliament of Georgia shall be the respondent to the cases under the present Article. (12.02.02 №1264)
3. The time-limit for submission of a constitutional claim under the present Article shall not exceed two weeks from the enforcement of the relevant decision of the Parliament of Georgia. (12.02.02 №1264)

Article 41

1. Not less than one third of the total number of the members of the Parliament of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional submission with the Constitutional Court in accordance with the procedure prescribed by the present Law, the organic Law of Georgia on Impeachment in order to obtain conclusions on the violation of the Constitution of Georgia by the President of Georgia, the President of the Supreme Court of Georgia, a member of the Government, the President of the Chamber of Control or the members of the Council of the National Bank. (07.11.2008 №475)

2. While drafting its conclusion on the issue the Constitutional Court shall have the right to invite to the hearing the relevant officials.
3. (12.02.02 №1264).

Article 41¹

1. In the cases, provided for by subparagraph “i” of the first paragraph of Article 19 of the present Law the President of Georgia, the Government of Georgia and not less than one fifth of the members of the Parliament of Georgia, Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Ajara shall have the right to lodge a constitutional claim with the Constitutional Court.
2. In the case provided for by the first paragraph of the present Article, that body/official shall be the respondent, that violated the constitutional law of Georgia on the Status of the Autonomous Republic of Ajara.
(25.11.04 №599)

Article 41²

1. In the cases, provided for by subparagraph “j” of the first paragraph of Article 19 of the present Law the Parliament of Georgia shall have the right to lodge a constitutional submission by the resolution with the Constitutional Court on conformity of normative acts of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Ajara with the Constitution of Georgia, the constitutional law of Georgia on the Status of the Autonomous Republic of Ajara, the constitutional agreement, international treaties and agreements of Georgia; and laws of Georgia.
2. Adoption for the consideration of the merits of the constitutional submission of the Parliament of Georgia shall result in suspension of the relevant normative act of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Ajara until a final judgment is adopted by the court.
(25.11.04 №599).

Article 42

1. In the cases, provided for by the second paragraph of Article 19 of the present Law a Court, considering a case shall be entitled to lodge a constitutional submission with the Constitutional Court. In such a case, the Constitutional Court shall consider the case in absentia of the author of the constitutional submission and the body the act of which has become the subject of the dispute. (12.02.02 №1264)
2. A constitutional submission of the court hearing the case as referred to in the present Article shall imply the submission lodged in accordance with the decision reached by an individual judge or a collegial composition of the Court considering the case. (12.02.02 №1264)

Article 43

1. The acts of the Constitutional Court shall be a judgment, a ruling, a recording notice and a conclusion. (12.02.02 №1264)
2. An act of the Constitutional Court shall be signed by all members of the Constitutional Court participating in the consideration of the case.
3. The act of the Constitutional Court not related to the consideration of a case shall be signed by the President and the Secretary to the Constitutional Court;
4. The Constitutional Court shall decide about the merits of the case in writing;
5. The Constitutional Court shall adopt recording notice on admission of a constitutional claim or a constitutional submission for the consideration of the merits, whereas a ruling shall be adopted on non-admission. (12.02.02 №1264 ).
 of Article 25 of the present Law In the cases provided for by paragraph 45 the Constitutional Court shall adopt a ruling. (25.11.04 №599 ).

5². The issues, provided for by the first  paragraphs of Article 21¹ of the present Law, the Constitutional court shall adopt a recording notice (27.06.2008 №65)

6. While considering the merits of the constitutional submission in the cases provided  of the present Law the and 4for by Articles 41 Constitutional Court shall adopt a judgment, whereas in the case provided for by the second paragraph of Article 38 and the first paragraph of Article 41 the Constitutional Court shall adopt a conclusion. (25.11.04 №599)
7. A judgment, a ruling and a conclusion of the Constitutional Court shall be reasoned.
8. A judgment, a ruling, a recording notice and a conclusion of the Constitutional Court shall be final and shall not be subject to appeal or revision. (12.02.02 №1264)
9. Non-admission of a constitutional claim or a constitutional submission by the Constitutional Court, if there is no , shall exclude theissues provided for by the first paragraph of Article 21 admission of a repeated application or another constitutional claim or a constitutional submission on the same subject and the same grounds.( 14.07.2008 №65)

Article 44

1. The Plenum of the Constitutional Court shall be authorised to adopt a judgment, if the sitting is attended by not less than six members.
2. A constitutional claim shall be deemed upheld and a conclusion on the constitutional submission accepted, if it is supported by more than half of the members present at the sitting of the Plenum. (12.02.02 №1264 )

Article 45

1. A Board of the Constitutional Court shall be authorised to consider a constitutional claim or a constitutional submission and adopt a judgment, if the sitting is attended by not less than three members.
2. A constitutional claim shall be deemed upheld, if it is supported by more than half of the members participating in the sitting of the Board. (12.02.02 №1264)

Article 46

1. A party shall have the right to claim before the Constitutional Court considering the case for the recusation of a member of the Constitutional Court participating in the consideration of the case if:
a. the member of the Constitutional Court is a close relative either of a party or of its representative;
b. the member of the Constitutional Court is directly or indirectly interested in the outcomes of the case, or if there are other circumstances which raise doubts as to the impartiality of the member of the Constitutional Court.
2. A member of the Constitutional Court shall have the right to withdraw from the participation in the consideration of a case where the grounds provided for by the present Article exist.
3. The application on the recusation or withdrawal of a member of the Constitutional Court shall be deemed upheld, if it is supported by more than half of the members participating in the sitting of the Constitutional Court.

Article 47

1. A member of the Constitutional Court participating in the consideration of a case shall be authorized to form a dissenting opinion, which shall be set out in writing.
2. The dissenting opinion of a member of the Constitutional Court shall be attached to the minutes of the sitting of the Constitutional Court and at the author's request shall be promulgated in the press together with the constitutional court judgment.
3. A constitutional court judgment, together with the dissenting opinion, shall be promulgated in full in the official gazette of the Constitutional Court.

Article 48

A member of the Constitutional Court shall not be authorized to reveal the gist of the deliberations held while adopting judgment by the Constitutional Court, nor the position held by a member of the Constitutional Court while voting.

Article 49

The costs of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court shall be borne by the state budget.

Article 50

1. State taxes shall be imposed on:
a. constitutional claims and constitutional submissions;
b. A ruling and a judgment of the Constitutional Court upon its repeated delivery.
2. The amount and the payment procedure of state taxes shall be defined by law.
3. The Constitutional Court shall not be authorized to exempt anybody from paying the state taxes, increase or decrease its amount.

Article 51
(12.02.02 №1264)

Article 52

A member of the Constitutional Court while considering a case in the Constitutional Court shall wear special attire, the style thereof shall be defined by the Rules of the Constitutional Court.

Article 53

1. The Constitutional Court shall possess the State Seal with State Emblem and the name of the Court on it.
2. The seat of the Constitutional Court shall be at the city of Batumi. (7.09.2006 №3549)

3. The State Flag of Georgia shall be hoisted on the administrative building of the Constitutional Court. (12.02.02 №1264)  
4. The State Flag of Georgia shall be present in the courtroom and the offices of the judges of the Constitutional Court. (12.02.02  №1264)
President of Georgia Eduard Shevardnadze

Tbilisi,
31 January 1996